Journal of Medicine and Applied Clinical Sciences | Volume 1 Issue 1 | Pages: 1-12

Research Article

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 31-Dec-2025

Comparative Evaluation of Binocular Visual Function in Myopic Individuals Wearing Spectacles and Soft Contact Lenses: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

• Ankit Sanjay Varshney
• Associate Professor, Department of Optometry, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Surat, India.

Gehendra Khadka
• Master of Optometry student, Department of Optometry, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Surat, India.

Chetna Patel
• Professor, Department of Optometry, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Surat, India.

Mahendrasinh D. Chauhan
• Principal, Department of Optometry, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Surat, India.

Abstract

Background: Myopia has emerged as a major global visual health concern, particularly among young adults. The mode of optical correction-spectacles or soft contact lenses (SCLs)-can influence binocular function through variations in vertex distance, prismatic effect, and accommodative demand. This study compared binocular visual performance between myopic individuals wearing spectacles and those using SCLs under habitual correction conditions.

Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted on 60 myopic participants (30 spectacle wearers and 30 SCL wearers) aged 18–35 years. Standardized optometric tests evaluated accommodation (amplitude, near point, relative accommodation), vergence (near point, fusional ranges, facility), and stereopsis. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and Pearson correlations at α = 0.05, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Cohen’s d, and post-hoc power reported.

Results: SCL wearers exhibited greater accommodative amplitude (Δ0.60 D, p = 0.03, d = 0.57) and positive relative accommodation (Δ0.27 D, p = 0.02, d = 0.63), along with a closer near point of accommodation (Δ0.70 cm, p = 0.04, d = 0.54). Vergence parameters also favored the SCL group, with a 1.30 cm closer near point of convergence (p = 0.01, d = 0.69) and higher vergence facility (p = 0.03, d = 0.57). Stereoacuity improved slightly but was not statistically significant (p = 0.21, d = 0.33). Positive correlations were observed between accommodative amplitude and vergence facility (r = 0.49, p < 0.01) and between near point of accommodation and convergence (r = 0.43, p = 0.02), indicating coordinated enhancement.

Conclusion: Soft contact lenses provide superior accommodative and vergence function compared to spectacles, promoting greater binocular efficiency and visual comfort. These findings suggest that SCLs may reduce eyestrain and improve endurance during prolonged near work and digital device use, representing a more physiologically natural correction modality for young myopic adults.

Keywords

Binocular vision, Accommodation, Vergence, Stereopsis, Myopia, Soft contact lenses, Spectacle correction

References

• Barth, B., Alves, M., & Kara-José, N. (2008). Visual performance in myopic correction with spectacles and soft contact lenses. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 71(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27492008000100019

  Comparing the AC/A ratio with spectacles and soft contact lenses in myopes. (2023). International Journal of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 5(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.33545/26648547.2023.v5.i1a.17

  Corpus, G., Molina-Martín, A., & Piñero, D. (2023). Efficacy of soft contact lenses for myopia control: A systematic review. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 39(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2271063

  Danayak, P., Trivedi, N., Sanghvi, K., Samanta, A., & Patel, A. (2014). A comparative study of the status of binocular vision and accommodation with spectacles and contact lenses in myopes. Indian Journal of Applied-Basic Medical Sciences, 22, 34–50. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijabms&volume=16a&issue=22&article=005

  Husna, H. N., & Ardi, A. K. (2022). Visual function of myopic students wearing contact lenses and spectacles. Journal of Eye Health and Research, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.57002/joehr.v4i1.269

  Jiménez, R., Martínez-Almeida, L., Salas, C., & Ortiz, C. (2011). Contact lenses versus spectacles in myopes: Is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function? Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 249(6), 925–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1570-z

  Kang, P., & Wildsoet, C. (2016). Acute and short-term changes in visual function with multifocal soft contact lens wear in young adults. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 39(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.09.004

  Kaymak, H., Neller, K., Schütz, S., Graff, B., Sickenberger, W., Langenbucher, A., Seitz, B., & Schwahn, H. (2022). Vision tests on spectacle lenses and contact lenses for optical myopia correction: A pilot study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 7(1), e000971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-000971

  Lam, C., Tang, W., Tse, D., Lee, R., Chun, R., Hasegawa, K., Qi, H., Hatanaka, T., & To, C. (2019). Defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses slow myopia progression: A 2-year randomised clinical trial. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 104(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313739

  Norazman, F., Mohd-Ali, B., Dardin, S., Shahimin, M., Fadzil, N., Saman, M., & Mohidin, N. (2024). Baseline accommodation and binocular vision measures in Malay schoolchildren enrolled in the Myopia Control Study using spectacle lenses in Kuala Lumpur. Clinical Optometry, 16, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S432496

  Pandurangaiah, P., & Pradeep Kumar, G. (2021). Analysis of the AC/A ratio in myopia patients in relation to spectacles and soft contact lenses. International Journal of Ophthalmology Research, 3(1b), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2021.v3.i1b.133

  Ruiz-Pomeda, A., Pérez-Sánchez, B., Cañadas, P., Prieto-Garrido, F. L., Gutiérrez-Ortega, R., & Villa-Collar, C. (2019). Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS). Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 257(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4115-5

  Schmid, K., Gifford, K., & Atchison, D. (2022). The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 45(6), 101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588

  Signes-Soler, I., Sivera, S., Cantó-Vañó, J., Giménez-Sanchís, I., & Albarrán-Diego, C. (2023). Visual performance of two designs of myopia management soft contact lenses compared with a monofocal one in young adults. Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, 18(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i4.14544

  VARSHNEY, A., Ruguge, D., & Mahida, H. (2024). Prevalence and impact of non-strabismic binocular vision disorders among college students in Surat District, Gujarat: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Medical Science Research and Practice, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14617498

  Vera, J., Redondo, B., Galán, T., Machado, P., Molina, R., Koulieris, G., & Jiménez, R. (2021). Dynamics of the accommodative response and facility with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 44(5), 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2021.101526

  Zhou, F., Li, X., Huang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, H., & Baoyindugurong, J. (2022). Effect of spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets on binocular vision and accommodation in myopic children with and without intermittent exotropia. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9306848