Journal of Medicine and Applied Clinical Sciences | Volume 2 Issue 1 | Pages: 34-51 | Doi : 10.67914/jmacs/rsa/2.1/34-51
Research Article
OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 30-Jun-2026

Occupational Ocular Surface Foreign-Body Injuries: Characterizing Workplace Exposures and Gaps in Protective Eyewear Use


    Kinnari Kalaria
  • Faculty and Consultant Optometrist, Nagar School of Optometry, Shree C. H. Nagri Municipal Eye Hospital, Ellis bridge, Ahmedabad, India.

  • Tanvi Patel
  • Nagar School of Optometry, Shree C. H. Nagri Municipal Eye Hospital, Ellis bridge, Ahmedabad, India.

  • Ankit Sanjay Varshney
  • Associate Professor, Department of Optometry, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Surat, India.

Abstract

Background: Occupational ocular surface foreign-body (OSFB) injuries are important yet largely preventable workplace eye injuries, particularly in occupations involving metal processing and particulate-generating activities. This study characterized the demographic, occupational, and clinical profile of occupational OSFB injuries and evaluated protective-eyewear practices and factors associated with protective-eyewear non-use.

Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study included 130 participants presenting with occupational OSFB injuries. Demographic characteristics, occupation, work activity at injury, foreign-body material and anatomical location, presenting symptoms, protective-eyewear use, reasons for non-use, previous OSFB injury, self-removal attempts, and awareness of ocular risks were recorded. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Associations were assessed using Pearson's χ² or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with protective-eyewear non-use, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Participants were predominantly male (123/130, 94.62%), and 68 (52.31%) worked in the metal industry. Metal grinding/cutting was the most common activity at injury (73, 56.15%). Metallic foreign bodies were predominant (77, 59.23%), with the cornea being the most frequently affected site (92, 70.77%). Ocular irritation was the most frequently reported symptom (77, 59.23%), followed by pain (65, 50.00%), redness (61, 46.92%), and watering (41, 31.54%). Only 27 participants (20.77%) reported using protective eyewear, whereas 103 (79.23%) reported no protection. Among non-users, the most common reason was PPE non-availability (36/103, 34.95%), followed by other reasons (24, 23.30%) and forgetting to wear PPE (21, 20.39%). Awareness of potential harm from self-removal was reported by 84 (64.62%) participants. PPE use was significantly associated with this awareness in bivariate analysis (29.8% vs 4.3%; χ²=10.17, p=0.001). In multivariable analysis, high-risk work activity was independently associated with PPE non-use (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.01–4.54, p=0.047), whereas awareness was not statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26–1.08, p=0.081).

Conclusion: Occupational OSFB injuries predominantly involved male workers engaged in metal-related, particulate-generating activities, with metallic foreign bodies and corneal involvement being most common. The high prevalence of PPE non-use highlights an important preventable safety gap. Prevention should combine reliable PPE availability, hazard-specific protective eyewear, worker adherence, and targeted occupational eye-health education.

Keywords

Occupational eye injury, ocular surface foreign body, protective eyewear, personal protective equipment, occupational safety, corneal foreign body, metal workers

References

  • Bahoo, M. A., Jamil, A. Z., & Khalid, M. S. (2018). Ocular surface foreign bodies and their association with profession. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 12, 495–498.

    Bel’hantier, C. L. S., Baqadir, G., Daghouj, L. E. M., Allali, B., & El Kettani, A. (2024). Superficial corneal foreign bodies: A series of 90 cases. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(3), 1370–1373. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.3.1883

    Bhattacharjee, D., & Varshney, A. (2025). Barriers to eye care access in low- and middle-income countries: Focus on Asia. Acta Scientific Ophthalmology, 8(10), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17430730

    Bhattacharjee, D., & Varshney, A. S. (2026). Global barriers to eye care access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of gender, geographic, and economic disparities. The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology, 8. https://doi.org/10.4103/pajo.pajo_13_26

    Dahiya, M., & Dua, M. (2020). Epidemiological profile of occupational ocular injury in a tertiary eye care centre of North India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 7(6), 2164–2168. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20202506

    Deshar, A., Pokharel, S., Lopchan, K., & Isha, N. (2026). Ocular surface foreign bodies: Types, location and correlation with occupation and use of protective eyewear. International Research Journal of Medicine and Surgery, 3, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjmeds.2026.v03i02.061

    Dhathri, K., Shwetha, N. C., Preethi, B., & Poornima, N. (2026). Work-related eye injuries: Prevalence, patterns, awareness of eye safety, and protective practice behaviours among industrial workers. Acta Medica International, 13(1).

    Gongo, D. T., Tubing, D. K., & Paley, D. T. (2025). Occupational risk factors, clinical outcomes, and patient perceptions of metallic corneal foreign body injuries at TRIHRMS, North East India. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM53290

    Kashyap, A., Sharma, S., & Negi, S. (2024). A study to evaluate the demographic pattern of the injury caused by metallic corneal foreign body and its outcome after treatment. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, 16(4), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i4.4092

    Khalid, A., Ayoob, M., Masood, A., Nashit, M., Sayeed, F. Z., & Fatima, A. (2024). Preventing ocular surface foreign body complications: Enhancing awareness and precaution. Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry, 13(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.36283/PJMD13-1/008

    Nagar, V. K., & Choudhary, N. (2024). A hospital-based study to evaluate etiology and epidemiology of occupational corneal foreign bodies. Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.pjms.2024.028

    Oboh, R. A., & Daniel, E. W. (2024). Ocular disorders and compliance to protective eyewear among quarry workers in Akamkpa Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2775

    Raj, K., Ravindranath, B. K., Varsha, S., Tiwari, H. D., Datla, P. K. V. K., & Tiwari, R. (2026). A hospital-based cross-sectional study on the suboptimal use of eye protective devices (EPDs) among blue-collar professionals in India. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 18(Suppl. 1), S115–S117. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_952_25

    Reddy, P. S., Nirmala, K., Radhika, S., Ravi, S., & Paul, C. (2016). Incidence of ocular surface foreign body and its correlation with specific occupation and preventive measures. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 5, 56–58.

    Sharma, R., Mamatha, B., Sharma, A., & Gyanchand, R. (2026). Visco-expression of deep stromal corneal foreign body: An innovative technique. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research, 14(1), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_233_25

    Sharma, R., Rani Sujatha, M. A., Prashant, C. N., Nagaraja, K. S., & Oza, Y. (2019). Incidence of repeated superficial metallic corneal foreign bodies, awareness and use of eye protection devices in suburban Bangalore (South India). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 10, 804.

    Sharma, S., Khadka, D., Shrestha, A., Shrestha, N., Suwal, B., Hamal, D., Shrestha, R., & Khatri, B. (2023). Epidemiological pattern of corneal foreign bodies and utilization of protective eye devices: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 13(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v13i1.45153

    Sun, F., Zhou, Y., Dong, L., & Qin, H. (2021). Relationship between the use and type of eye protection and work-related corneal and conjunctival foreign body injuries. Injury Prevention, 27, 521–526.

    Ulutaş, H. G., Özdemir, L., Amuk Hamidi, N., Doğanay, D., & Duru, Y. (2024). Investigation of the prevalence of foreign body exposure to the eyes and the use of protective equipment in the employees of the Çalı Industrial Zone. International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 9(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1414433

    Varshney, A. S., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2024). Firework-related ocular injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and preventive strategies. Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology, 34(4), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.4103/DLJO.DLJO_182_24

    Varshney, A. S., Najwa, M., & Reshamwala, V. (2024). Visual outcomes after corneal tear repair in children: RGP v/s soft contact lenses. JOJ Ophthalmology, 10(4), 555794. https://doi.org/10.19080/JOJO.2024.10.555794