Journal of Analytical and Applied Computer Sciences
Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal
ISSN: 3139-3349
Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal
ISSN: 3139-3349
Submission Guidelines
It is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal, dedicated to exploring the original research findings among the scientific communities. It publishes Research Articles, Reviews and Research Notes in all aspects of Computer Sciences. The scope of the journal is multidisciplinary, especially of applied nature.
Submission of Manuscript: Authors are requested to submit their manuscripts only online. Only papers of high scientific quality will be accepted for publication. The manuscript will be analyzed for plagiarism with Turnitin before the acceptance for the review process. Acceptance of papers is the sole discretion of the Editor based on the recommendations from the Chief Editor, editorial board members, and additional reviewers. Manuscripts submitted will be subjected to peer review by two reviewers familiar with the relevant field of research, being from a different country or at least from another institution from the author. Authors may suggest names and addresses of two experts who, in their opinion, can review the paper. The choice of referees will, however, remain with the editorial board. After the review process, the Editor will inform about the acceptance, rejection, or necessity of revision of the manuscript to the corresponding author.
If you find any difficulty, email us: citejpub@gmail.com
Manuscript Types
The Journal of Analytical and Applied Computer Sciences accepts original scholarly contributions covering computer science and related interdisciplinary areas within the scope of the journal.
The journal considers the following manuscript types:
All scholarly research manuscripts are subject to the journal's peer-review process. Normally, research manuscripts are evaluated by at least two independent reviewers in accordance with the journal's Peer Review Policy.
Authors should select the manuscript type that most accurately reflects the content and purpose of their submission.
1. Research Articles
Research Articles present original research that contributes new knowledge, methods, systems, algorithms, applications, theoretical findings, empirical evidence, or computational approaches.
A Research Article should provide sufficient methodological and technical information to allow the work to be understood and, where appropriate, reproduced by other researchers.
Recommended structure
The structure may be modified when the nature of the research requires a different presentation.
Abstract
The abstract should normally be concise and should clearly state:
An abstract of approximately 150–300 words is recommended.
Keywords
Provide 4–8 keywords or key phrases that accurately represent the subject of the article.
2. Review Articles
Review Articles provide a critical and comprehensive synthesis of published research on an important topic within the journal's scope.
A review should do more than summarise individual publications. It should identify major developments, compare findings, discuss methodological differences, identify limitations and unresolved questions, and highlight future research directions.
Recommended structure
The exact structure may vary according to the subject.
Length
There is no strict maximum word limit for a full Review Article. Authors should provide sufficient coverage of the relevant literature without unnecessary repetition.
Review manuscripts should normally contain a substantial and up-to-date reference base.
Authors should ensure that relevant and contrasting viewpoints are considered and that citations are balanced and appropriate.
3. Systematic Review Articles
Systematic Review Articles should use a clearly defined and reproducible methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesise relevant published literature.
Systematic reviews should clearly describe:
Where appropriate, authors are encouraged to follow recognised reporting standards such as PRISMA.
Recommended structure
For systematic reviews involving quantitative synthesis, the statistical methods should be described sufficiently for readers to understand and evaluate the analysis.
4. Research Notes / Short Communications
Research Notes and Short Communications are intended for concise reports of original findings that are scientifically useful but do not require the length of a full Research Article.
They may include:
A Research Note should not simply be an incomplete Research Article.
Recommended structure
The manuscript should be concise and focused. Approximately 1,500–3,000 words is recommended, although the journal may consider longer or shorter submissions depending on the contribution.
5. Methodology and Technical Articles
Methodology and Technical Articles describe a new or substantially improved:
The manuscript should clearly explain what is new and why the proposed method provides a meaningful contribution.
Recommended structure
Where software or code is central to the contribution, authors are encouraged to provide information regarding software versions, programming languages, dependencies, datasets, computational environment, and code availability.
6. Case Studies and Application Reports
Case Studies and Application Reports describe the application of computer-science methods, systems, algorithms, software, or technologies to a specific real-world problem or environment.
A suitable Case Study should demonstrate a clear practical or scientific contribution rather than merely describe routine software use.
The manuscript should explain:
Recommended structure
If a case study contains identifiable information relating to individuals, organisations, or confidential systems, authors must ensure that appropriate permissions, consent, anonymisation, and ethical safeguards are in place.
7. Perspectives
Perspective articles provide an informed and evidence-based discussion of an emerging issue, research direction, technology, methodology, or development within computer science.
Perspectives should present a clear scholarly argument supported by appropriate literature.
They may discuss:
A Perspective should not be written as an unsupported personal opinion.
Recommended structure
Approximately 1,500–4,000 words is recommended.
8. Editorials and Invited Commentaries
Editorials and Invited Commentaries provide scholarly commentary on topics relevant to the journal, including developments in the field, significant research trends, special issues, or matters of broad interest to the journal's readership.
These contributions may be:
Editorials and invited commentaries should be evidence-based and should clearly distinguish interpretation or commentary from established findings.
Editorials and invited commentaries are not substitutes for original research.
The journal may subject invited commentaries to editorial assessment or peer review depending on their content and purpose. The applicable editorial process will be determined by the Editor-in-Chief.
General Requirements for All Manuscript Types
Regardless of manuscript type, authors must ensure that submissions meet the following requirements.
Originality
The manuscript must be original and must not have been published previously or be under consideration by another journal.
Simultaneous submission to multiple journals is not permitted.
Language
Manuscripts should be written in clear and understandable English.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that the manuscript has been adequately edited for language, grammar, terminology, and clarity before submission.
Title
The title should be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the content of the manuscript.
Avoid unnecessary abbreviations, unexplained acronyms, excessive punctuation, and claims that cannot be supported by the manuscript.
Author Information
The title page should include:
The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the journal during the editorial and publication process.
Abstract
The abstract should be understandable without requiring readers to consult the main text.
Avoid references and unexplained abbreviations in the abstract wherever possible.
Keywords
Use relevant terms that accurately describe the subject of the manuscript and facilitate discovery and indexing.
Tables
Tables should:
Figures
Figures should be clear and of sufficient quality for publication.
Each figure should have:
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for copyrighted figures or other third-party material when permission is required.
Software, Code and Algorithms
Where software, source code, algorithms, or computational workflows are essential to the research, authors should provide sufficient technical information to support understanding and reproducibility.
Where possible, authors are encouraged to provide code through an appropriate repository and include the relevant repository link or persistent identifier.
Data Availability
Authors should include a Data Availability Statement where applicable.
Examples include:
Data available:
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from [repository] at [persistent identifier].
Data included in the article:
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article and/or its supplementary materials.
Restricted data:
The datasets generated during the study are not publicly available because of [reason], but may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to applicable restrictions.
Ethics Statement
Where applicable, authors must provide information regarding ethical approval, informed consent, privacy protection, institutional approval, or other relevant ethical requirements.
If ethical approval is not applicable, authors should state:
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Authors must not provide false or misleading statements regarding ethical approval.
Funding Statement
Authors should disclose all sources of financial support for the research.
If no specific funding was received, authors may state:
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this research.
Author Contributions
Authors should provide a clear statement describing their respective contributions to the research and manuscript.
Competing Interests
Authors should disclose any financial, professional, personal, or other interests that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the work.
If there are no competing interests, authors may state:
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AI and Automated Tools Disclosure
Authors remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and validity of their manuscripts.
Where generative AI or other automated tools have materially contributed to the preparation, analysis, generation, or modification of the manuscript or research, the use should be disclosed.
AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
Routine use of AI-assisted spelling, grammar, formatting, or language-editing tools does not normally require disclosure.
Authors must independently verify AI-assisted content, including factual claims, references, data interpretation, and other generated material.
References
References should be relevant, accurate, and complete.
The journal uses APA style for references.
Authors should ensure that:
Authors should cite primary research sources where appropriate and use recent literature when relevant to the subject.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary datasets, code, algorithms, tables, figures, questionnaires, protocols, or other supporting materials may be submitted where they provide useful additional information.
Supplementary materials should be clearly labelled and referenced in the main manuscript.
Manuscript Formatting
Unless otherwise specified for a particular article type:
Peer Review
Research Articles, Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Research Notes, Methodology and Technical Articles, Case Studies, and Perspectives are normally evaluated through the journal's double-blind peer-review process.
At least two independent reviewers will normally be invited to evaluate these scholarly submissions.
The final editorial decision is made by the journal based on the peer-review reports, the quality of the manuscript, its relevance to the journal, and the overall editorial assessment.
Authors may suggest potential reviewers, but the final selection of reviewers remains with the journal.
Further information is available in the Peer Review Policy.
Publication Ethics
All authors must comply with the journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement (PEMS).
The journal does not tolerate:
Post-Publication Corrections and Retractions
Authors are expected to notify the journal promptly if a significant error is discovered in a published article.
Depending on the circumstances, the journal may publish a correction, corrigendum, erratum, Expression of Concern, or retraction in accordance with its publication-ethics policies.
Submission Checklist
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should confirm that:
Editorial Decision
After submission, the manuscript will undergo an initial editorial assessment to determine whether it:
Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements may be returned to the authors before peer review.
Manuscripts considered suitable for review will be sent to independent reviewers according to the journal's Peer Review Policy.
The possible editorial decisions include:
The journal reserves the right to request revisions before or after peer review when necessary to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal's editorial and ethical standards.